I am also an afairiest; I deny the existence of fairies. Yet it would be absurd to refer to myself this way, so why is religion different? People are not born with religion. They may be born into religion, but it is a meme, a virus of the mind.
If I have no way of disproving the existence of a god authority, how can I be so sure that there isn’t one?
The burden of proof is on those making the claim. From that, assuming the authority exists in a way that seems exactly like it does not, I come to ‘agnosticism’.
“Huxley coined the word “agnostic” to describe his position on knowledge and religious belief – that one cannot, and should not claim to, know things for which there is no evidence.”
If a god exists, its nature is inherently unknowable. But so are fairies and I’m still not ready to accept a position any less than afairiest on those. I am not agnostic about the Nordic gods, I choose to live my life assuming there is no supernatural authority.
Take Christianity as an example:
Why does anyone need a book that contradictorily tells us that
- homosexuality is an abomination worthy of death,
Romans 1:31-32
Corinthians 6:9-10 - eating shellfish is also an abomination,
Leviticus 11:9-12
Deuteronomy 14:9-10
www.godhatesshrimp.com - figs are evil
Matthew21:18-20
www.godhatesfigs.com - yet be kind to others?
Romans 12:9-10
Romans 12:15-21
www.skepticsannotatedbible.com
No comments:
Post a Comment